Missionary cultures and high purpose orgs attract a lot more ‘shower thoughts’ workers. Still from my experience there are a few. There is no one universal rule to hiring or even enhancing the number of these shower thoughts workers. Hiring and increasing the number of ‘shower thoughts’ workers As the company gets bigger, the proportion of the ‘shower thoughts’ workers drops to about 10-20% you also start seeing the first of the “<10% focused” folks. The rest are in the ’10-50% focus’ / meets expectation category. They are incredible brand and cultural ambassadors internally and externally. They work long punishing hours, are proactive and get things done, often without necessarily seeking permission. I find that early on, when team sizes are in the <20 number, you have about a third to half of the company as the ’50%+ focus’ workers – they have ‘shower thoughts’ about the company and its problems. It’s around when you start annoying your coworkers and/or significant other, although that part is avoidable with practice.” It’s when you start habitually asking “how could this go faster?” It’s when you get relentlessly resourceful. It’s when you start caring enough to think about it in the shower. “50%+ focus” is roughly when something becomes the top idea in your mind. <10% focused on the job at hand: meaningful risk of getting fired.ġ0-50% focus: “meets expectations,” gets regular raises.ĥ0%+ focus: superstar, 10x engineer, destined for greatness. “That experience of mine resonates strongly with Byrne Hobart’s observation about focus in knowledge work : The output of knowledge workers is extremely skewed based on focus. Kuhn references a post by Byrne Hobart, and writes ![]() This metaphor comes from an article i read by Ben Kuhn titled ‘ Attention is your scarcest resource ’. I have been thinking about this topic, and have found the metaphor of ‘shower thoughts’ useful to approach this. However as the team grows larger, these non-performers can sometimes linger for a while. Clearly when the team size is smaller, it is hard for non-performers to stand out, and hence they get weeded out faster, or even get the right feedback, and improve. Sometimes more frequently than that.Īs Blume’s team size has grown, we too have had our share of less motivated and low-performing teammates. ![]() Almost every month or two, someone is being let go, or counselled. Once a company nears Series A, team size crosses 30 - I haven’t heard of too many Indian companies with low team counts (this is a topic for another post!) – and invariably the founder’s attention is drawn to managing employee performance or the impact of this. A frequent conversation topic that comes up with founders is that of indivdual employee performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |